Difference between revisions of "Photo realistic"
From GIMP GUI Redesign
(New page: '''Photo Realistic''' - creating high quality photo realistic ----) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Photo Realistic''' - creating high quality photo realistic | '''Photo Realistic''' - creating high quality photo realistic | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Icons in the Toolbox: | ||
| + | * not meaningful enough | ||
| + | * should have strong contours, be good metaphors, differentiate by colors, | ||
| + | * pen and pencil have almost the same angle and color, at least the color should be changed | ||
| + | * new icons for Dodge/Burn and Eraser | ||
| + | * Levels, Curves, Threshold represent the dialog window, not the its meaning & function | ||
| + | * all the transformation tool look almost the same, the color is the same, just the details differ | ||
| + | * Ink tool would be better represented with a nib | ||
| + | * Crop&resize is not enough differentiated from the bg, and it’s difficult to know what it is; traditional two L were better, like in Adobe | ||
| + | * measure tool is too complicated, detailed; old one (in www.doc.gimp.org)was better | ||
Revision as of 08:27, 2 March 2007
Photo Realistic - creating high quality photo realistic
Icons in the Toolbox:
- not meaningful enough
- should have strong contours, be good metaphors, differentiate by colors,
- pen and pencil have almost the same angle and color, at least the color should be changed
- new icons for Dodge/Burn and Eraser
- Levels, Curves, Threshold represent the dialog window, not the its meaning & function
- all the transformation tool look almost the same, the color is the same, just the details differ
- Ink tool would be better represented with a nib
- Crop&resize is not enough differentiated from the bg, and it’s difficult to know what it is; traditional two L were better, like in Adobe
- measure tool is too complicated, detailed; old one (in www.doc.gimp.org)was better
