Difference between revisions of "Usability"

From GIMP GUI Redesign
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 36: Line 36:
 
* The [[GIMP UI Redesign#product vision|product vision]] is used as a starting point to find the right partners (interviewees) for the mental models interviews.  
 
* The [[GIMP UI Redesign#product vision|product vision]] is used as a starting point to find the right partners (interviewees) for the mental models interviews.  
 
* Finding the right interview partners is pivotal. Recruiting must be carefully prepared and carried out.
 
* Finding the right interview partners is pivotal. Recruiting must be carefully prepared and carried out.
 
  
 
====Ideas for Conducting the Method====
 
====Ideas for Conducting the Method====
Embed an intern via [http://www.openusability.org/ OpenUsability]
+
Embed an intern via [http://www.openusability.org/ OpenUsability].
* Valuable help can be provided by the intern before, during and after the field phase, e.g.  
+
Valuable help can be provided by the intern before, during and after the field phase, e.g.  
 
* brainstorm ideas for optimal recruiting
 
* brainstorm ideas for optimal recruiting
 
* recruit interview partners
 
* recruit interview partners

Revision as of 14:09, 30 May 2011

Aims

  • provide further information and understanding in the following areas:
    • users ("who?")
    • tasks ("what?", "how?")
    • context ("where, when, why?")

Proposed Method

  • Mental Models by Indi Young
    • qualitative method
    • based on open interviews (no questionnaires)
  • Further information on this method is available, see:
    • The book (rosenfeld media) Mental Models
    • excerpts available for online reading via paperc (German website, free account required, book in English)
    • The author explaining the method in this Video
    • diagrams from the book on flickr

Course of Actions

  1. define audience segments based on product vision
  2. set scope of the interviews
  3. recruit interview partners
  4. conduct interviews
    • at least 4 interviews per audience segment
    • focus: tasks, behaviours and philosophies of users
  5. transcribe interviews
  6. analyze results
    • distillation of tasks, behaviours and philosophies into patterns
    • create graphic of patterns in a mental model
    • oppose mental model vs. existing functionality
  7. make use
    • gap analysis (planned and existing functionality vs. users' behavior, needs and tasks)
    • adjust user scenarios / audience segments
    • derive stragety for development
    • prioritize features (importance vs. feasability)

Recruiting

  • The product vision is used as a starting point to find the right partners (interviewees) for the mental models interviews.
  • Finding the right interview partners is pivotal. Recruiting must be carefully prepared and carried out.

Ideas for Conducting the Method

Embed an intern via OpenUsability. Valuable help can be provided by the intern before, during and after the field phase, e.g.

  • brainstorm ideas for optimal recruiting
  • recruit interview partners
  • conduct interviews / parallel transcription while interviewing
  • transcribe and analyze interviews
  • help build the visualization

Deliverables

  • Mental Model Diagram
    • one diagram per audience segment
    • tasks organized in "Mental Spaces" of users
    • justified audience segments based on tasks
    • gap analysis
    • functionality overview will be confronted with users' perspective
  • A primer describing the target audience of GIMP can be derived (e.g. 20-40 page pdf about users, tasks, context; for both new and seasoned developers or interaction / usability contributors)


pros and cons

  • (+) pros
    • fundamental research, broad focus, high-level
    • detailed analysis of users and their tasks
    • research is built on existing findings
    • verification of user scenarios / audience segments
    • based on tasks and behavior
    • adaptable / scalable method
    • supports strategic vision and long-term development
    • revision and clarification of user scenarios
  • (-) cons
    • fundamental research, broad focus, high-level
    • no immediate improvements
    • complex method
    • not all existing findings are considered