Difference between revisions of "Usability"

From GIMP GUI Redesign
Jump to: navigation, search
(Proposed Method)
(45 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[Mental Models for GIMP]]===
+
===Aims===
Description of the first mental model project in late 2011.
+
* provide further information and understanding in the following areas:
 +
** users ("who?")
 +
** tasks ("what?", "how?")
 +
** context ("where, when, why?")
  
===[[Mental Models for GIMP as a student project]]===
+
===Proposed Method===
Description of the second Mental Models project of summer 2012.
+
* Mental Models by Indi Young
 +
** qualitative method
 +
** based on open interviews (no questionnaires)
 +
* Further information on this method is available, see:
 +
** The book (rosenfeld media) [http://rosenfeldmedia.com/books/mental-models/ Mental Models]
 +
** excerpts available for online reading [http://paperc.de/18382-mental-models-9781457102301#!/pages/1 via paperc] (German website, free account required, book in English)
 +
** The author explaining the method in this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4AsxNg9nNU Video]
 +
** diagrams from the book on [http://www.flickr.com/photos/rosenfeldmedia/sets/72157603511616271/ flickr]
 +
 
 +
====Connection to Exsiting Research====
 +
* using [[User Scenarios]] as a hypothesis for audience segmentation
 +
* [[GIMP UI Redesign#functionality overview|functionality overview]] will be confronted with users' perspective
 +
 
 +
====Course of Actions====
 +
# define audience (already existing: [[User Scenarios]])
 +
# recruit participants, set scope and conduct interviews
 +
#* at least 4 interviews per audience segment
 +
#* focus: tasks, behaviours and philosophies of users
 +
#* transcribe interviews
 +
# analyze results
 +
#* distillation of tasks, behaviours and philosophies into patterns
 +
#* create graphic of patterns in a mental model
 +
#* oppose mental model vs. planned and existing functionality
 +
# make use
 +
#* gap analysis (planned and existing functionality vs. users' behavior, needs and tasks)
 +
#* adjust user scenarios / audience segments
 +
#* derive stragety for development
 +
#* prioritize features (importance vs. feasability)
 +
 
 +
====pros and cons====
 +
*(+) pros
 +
** fundamental research, broad focus, high-level
 +
** detailed analysis of users and their tasks
 +
** research is built on existing findings
 +
** verification of user scenarios / audience segments
 +
** based on tasks and behavior
 +
** adaptable / scalable method
 +
** supports strategic vision and long-term development
 +
** revision and clarification of user scenarios
 +
 
 +
* (-) cons
 +
** fundamental research, broad focus, high-level
 +
** no immediate improvements
 +
** complex method
 +
** not all existing findings are considered
 +
 
 +
===Deliverables===
 +
* primer (20-40 page pdf about users, tasks, context)
 +
* Mental Model Diagram
 +
** one diagram per audience segment
 +
** tasks organized in "Mental Spaces" of users
 +
** justified audience segments based on tasks
 +
** gap analysis

Revision as of 13:17, 30 May 2011

Aims

  • provide further information and understanding in the following areas:
    • users ("who?")
    • tasks ("what?", "how?")
    • context ("where, when, why?")

Proposed Method

  • Mental Models by Indi Young
    • qualitative method
    • based on open interviews (no questionnaires)
  • Further information on this method is available, see:
    • The book (rosenfeld media) Mental Models
    • excerpts available for online reading via paperc (German website, free account required, book in English)
    • The author explaining the method in this Video
    • diagrams from the book on flickr

Connection to Exsiting Research

Course of Actions

  1. define audience (already existing: User Scenarios)
  2. recruit participants, set scope and conduct interviews
    • at least 4 interviews per audience segment
    • focus: tasks, behaviours and philosophies of users
    • transcribe interviews
  3. analyze results
    • distillation of tasks, behaviours and philosophies into patterns
    • create graphic of patterns in a mental model
    • oppose mental model vs. planned and existing functionality
  4. make use
    • gap analysis (planned and existing functionality vs. users' behavior, needs and tasks)
    • adjust user scenarios / audience segments
    • derive stragety for development
    • prioritize features (importance vs. feasability)

pros and cons

  • (+) pros
    • fundamental research, broad focus, high-level
    • detailed analysis of users and their tasks
    • research is built on existing findings
    • verification of user scenarios / audience segments
    • based on tasks and behavior
    • adaptable / scalable method
    • supports strategic vision and long-term development
    • revision and clarification of user scenarios
  • (-) cons
    • fundamental research, broad focus, high-level
    • no immediate improvements
    • complex method
    • not all existing findings are considered

Deliverables

  • primer (20-40 page pdf about users, tasks, context)
  • Mental Model Diagram
    • one diagram per audience segment
    • tasks organized in "Mental Spaces" of users
    • justified audience segments based on tasks
    • gap analysis