Difference between revisions of "Expert Evaluation Notes"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=== [[Evaluation Notes - Photo Composing|Photo composing]] === | === [[Evaluation Notes - Photo Composing|Photo composing]] === | ||
− | composing images from multiple photos. [[Evaluation Notes - Photo Composing|read notes]] | + | composing images from multiple photos. [[Evaluation Notes - Photo Composing|read notes]]for this scenario. |
+ | |||
=== [[Evaluation Notes - Creating Original Art|Creating original art]] === | === [[Evaluation Notes - Creating Original Art|Creating original art]] === | ||
creating original art, a collage of found images and wild brushwork. [[Evaluation Notes - Creating Original Art|read notes]] | creating original art, a collage of found images and wild brushwork. [[Evaluation Notes - Creating Original Art|read notes]] |
Revision as of 06:21, 13 April 2007
Contents
introduction
To evaluate GIMP functionality we went through our eight user scenarios. We focused on functionality that would support users to achieve their goals, while executing these essential tasks. Within some of the scenarios we have already thought about some initial design solutions, because the required functionality was not there.
the raw notes are filed under their user scenarios:
Photo Realistic
edit photo-realistic images to production/exhibition quality. read notes for this scenario.
Photo composing
composing images from multiple photos. read notesfor this scenario.
Creating original art
creating original art, a collage of found images and wild brushwork. read notes
Icon design
designing icons with in cooperation with vector programs. read notes
Working on icon container
edit existing icons. read notes.
Creating Web images
creating bitmap elements for web pages, also using photographic material. read notes
Creating macros & scripts
automating repetitive tasks and create 'black boxes.' read notes
Batch processing
perform graphic operations on many files. read notes